<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supporting your candidate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonathanarogers.com/2008/04/22/supporting-your-candidate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonathanarogers.com/2008/04/22/supporting-your-candidate/</link>
	<description>What I&#039;m Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:48:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://jonathanarogers.com/2008/04/22/supporting-your-candidate/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanrogers.wordpress.com/?p=435#comment-450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the media claim Clinton is more electable because they love that people are actually paying attention to politics and watching the news. They want the race to continue so they can sell ads- is that too cynical?

Also, I would like to hope we are past that stage, but unfortunately I have doubts. On the other hand, I bet those are republicans anyway and unlikely to vote Dem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the media claim Clinton is more electable because they love that people are actually paying attention to politics and watching the news. They want the race to continue so they can sell ads- is that too cynical?</p>
<p>Also, I would like to hope we are past that stage, but unfortunately I have doubts. On the other hand, I bet those are republicans anyway and unlikely to vote Dem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonia</title>
		<link>http://jonathanarogers.com/2008/04/22/supporting-your-candidate/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonathanrogers.wordpress.com/?p=435#comment-449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is an interesting belief, since all the news outlets seem to be pushing the Clinton view that she is more likely to be elected in the general election. But when you say it like you do, it seems you might have a point. I wonder though, about the ardent anti-Clinton and anti-Obama parties-- how much do you think the anti-female and anti-black population is included? Or are we past that stage?...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an interesting belief, since all the news outlets seem to be pushing the Clinton view that she is more likely to be elected in the general election. But when you say it like you do, it seems you might have a point. I wonder though, about the ardent anti-Clinton and anti-Obama parties&#8211; how much do you think the anti-female and anti-black population is included? Or are we past that stage?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

